850°

Gamescom: Infamous 2's New Old Cole Revealed

IGN writes: "At Comic-Con, Sucker Punch and Sony announced that the new Cole McGrath – v-neck shirt, hair, etc. -- folks saw when Infamous 2 debuted wouldn't be making the final cut of the game. Instead, the developers were taking Cole in a direction more in line with what he was in the first game. Today at Gamescom, we got our first glimpse at the new old Cole."

Commander_TK5413d ago

Shame that the badass voice isn´t coming back

WhittO5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

TBH the voice actor didnt do much for me, made Cole feel bland TBH, even at parts he wasn't meant to be (like when Trish dies etc.).

Infamous 2 looks soo good, cant wait to play it, next year is going to be another huge year.

Feels like they have put all of their games into next year so GT5 has the rest of this year all to itself haha (and Move)

Cevapi885413d ago

still got LBP2...that game transcends age and core/casual...everyone can enjoy the game, from kids to adults, the casual crowd to the hardcore...a commercial with sackboy wearing a santa hat just in time for the holidays would be perfect PR for the game as parents look at what to buy their kids

Snoogins5413d ago

Come on, guy. Don't be a douche. Apply
**SPOILER**
**SPOILER**
if you're going to reveal plot points in your post.

WhittO5413d ago

lol ye i thought about that but cant edit now, oops lol.

If you still haven't played Infamous yet, then you deserve to be spoiled!! haha jk (kinda)

Rumor5413d ago

glad they listened!

on another not, im glad the trailers for infamous now say it only does super heroes lol because infamous is NOT a family game at all! lol 5 year old wanting to be parkour superheroes doenst add up too well.

TheLastGuardian5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

I don't care if his voice does sound bland. It's not the same voice so It's not the same person. Shaved heads are so cliche' the pants are cool but I hope there will be unlockable outfits. The new trailer looks amazing but I want to hear more info like on the ice powers and whatnot.

0mega45413d ago

this is how you keep fans and sales

this is how you get goty

if Microsoft would only remember its core
and focus less on hand gestures

WhittO5409d ago (Edited 5409d ago )

lol bit harsh?

It's only an opinion, doesn't mean to say I'm right or everything I am saying makes sense, it's just MY OPINION.

O and if you mean because of the Spoiler, Come on how have you not been spoiled yet it came out May 2009 lol. Your fault for putting a great game off that long!!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5409d ago
Crazyglues5413d ago

Absolutely Stunning... Can't wait for this one

.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____||

avengers19785412d ago

This is great news for me... I mean come on is a guy who went through all the crap cole did really gonna worry that much about his hair...New cole was a metro sexual, Old cole was badass... I'll take the badass lightning weilder thank-you very much.

Domer255412d ago

Really excited about this sequel. Nuff said--------

Oh and F@ck Yeah!

Crazyglues5412d ago (Edited 5412d ago )

well I see your two disagrees, on my comment above and I raise you two agrees... LoL

Come on' Remember that bad A** trailer from part one ( http://www.youtube.com/watc... )... it was like straight out of a comic book... I"m pumped that the old cole is back, I don't know who could disagree with that..

-he looked so bad A** in part one.. and now he's back -Can't wait 4 this one..

.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____||

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5409d ago
Jrome5413d ago

I kind of liked new cole...

spartan112g5413d ago

I'm happy that they went back to how Cole looked in the first game. It was going to be weird playing as someone who looked so different.

Jrome5413d ago

Now it just looks like new cole got his head chopped off and replaced with old cole..it would be better if new old cole had the clothes to match his new old look

rdgneoz35413d ago

Yah, I loved his old clothes. The evil Cole had sick black and white clothing.

Thatguy-3105412d ago

dude i dont know what ur happy about ... he doesnt look near similar to the cole in the first one !!! just that he went bald again

SeanRL5413d ago

He looks worse than both coles. Sorry, but I would rather have had new cole. Make it an option.

TheBatman_Fanatic5413d ago

I agree! The first inFamous 2 Cole looked better!

Snoogins5413d ago

I agree. Just seems odd to revert back to old Cole while sporting a new voice. I didn't like the change at first, but grew to love the metro-chic Cole with hair. I'm afraid I'll never grow to love this new change. At least the game should still kick major ass.

Neo Nugget5413d ago

Agreed.

Cole with hair was badass. Now he just looks.....ehhhhh.

BYE5413d ago

He looks like a cross between old Cole and Nico Belic.

Sucker Punch seems to be really scared of the fanbase, why can't they just grow some and stick to their original plan?

x5exotic5413d ago

it is people like you who keep bitching about what they make that confuses them...not scares them

BYE5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

I'm fine with whatever direction they decide to go, as long as it's their OWN idea.

In this case they just changed him back because people like you were crying. And I'm sure Sucker Punch themselves aren't too happy about it.

nnotdead5413d ago

im with Ceekay. i find it lame they would change the look of Cole just because a few people whined about it on the interenet. if they are real fans they would play the game regardless. like i plan to do. make him look like Steven Segal for all i care.

Persistantthug5413d ago

The people who bought the game are already invested in old Cole.

Bought the game, bought themes.....

Trying to change him to "new Cole" is slapping the fans of Infamous 1 in the face.

Not only that, but it was gonna be silly to pretend that old Cole never existed or he just supernaturally changed his looks.

Sucker Punch not only did the fans a service, but they did the continuity of the game a service as well....which in turn does themselves a service because it shows they in fact are listening.

Sucker Punch should be commended.
They'll certainly be rewarded with my money.

cb4g5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

...I've invested many hours in inFamous and even read the comics. I've gotten to know Cole as a character but I could understand Sucker Punch's reason for altering his looks.

But the first redesign was just a slap in the face for the character's fans. It wasn't Cole anymore. He was, as Sucker Punch described, "an extreme sports star like Travis Pastrana, Tony Hawk...with superpowers."

Forget the last fight between Cole/Kessler and forget Kessler's psychological crippling of Cole throughout the game and his attempts to prepare Cole for the Beast. Cole was now going to be a cool and personable metrosexual. Bah!

Zeke's redesign was perfect. He looked different but familiar. Small changes to enhance the character - not plastic surgery and an attitude overhaul. Why not apply the same principles with Cole?

Thatguy-3105412d ago

totally agree with you.. their just trying to please everyone that little by little they will be making cole's appearance worst... they should have just sticked to what they were going for in the first place... ppl who bitched at the change in the appearance aren't true fans... the ones that are true fans are the ones that respect the decision and direction the developer of the game wants to take... at the end all what the real fans want is just a badass game with awesome gameplay mechanics !!!!!

Thatguy-3105412d ago (Edited 5412d ago )

i hate the new look

LiquifiedArt5412d ago (Edited 5412d ago )

...When you build a character's visual style and completely change it in a sequel. The consistency of the story fails and ruins the long-term experience.

The writers would have to pull off some major shifty-ness to make a believable plot line to coincide with the visual changes. One which I highly doubt exists.

"Coal grew up.He now has hair, completely different bone structure oh yea and a new voice." lol.

Im' glad they remedied the visual, atleast now the voice is the only inconsistency and hopefully they'll work the gritty voice in (possibly if you go evil).

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5412d ago
brew5413d ago (Edited 5413d ago )

I'm happy with Cole's looks now. It looks like him instead of a completely different character. I think I'll get used to the new voice actor.

Zeke's makeover looked great , but they kept the same voice actor(yuck). Zeke's voice is the first thing they should have addressed imo.

Snoogins5413d ago

I'm perfectly fine with Zeke's new look. The only thing that needed to be changed from the original, in my opinion, was the gay street clown look.

Show all comments (90)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor29d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7229d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7229d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

29d ago
S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7228d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 27d ago
drivxr29d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation29d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

29d ago
DarXyde28d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50128d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer26d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 26d ago
29d ago
29d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6929d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave29d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit29d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno29d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit29d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay29d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7228d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos29d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania29d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox29d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

29d ago
Bathyj29d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

29d ago
BeHunted29d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit29d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

29d ago
drivxr29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania29d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox29d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

29d ago
S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Lightning7729d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts29d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango29d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7729d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts29d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit28d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7728d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer29d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos29d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer29d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit29d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion29d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer29d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14929d ago (Edited 29d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake28d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha

OSZAR »